Simple record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Mendoza, Joan Manuel
dc.contributor.otherGallego-Schmid, Alejandro
dc.contributor.otherLópez Eccher, Camila
dc.contributor.otherMuñoz, Edmundo
dc.contributor.otherSalvador, Rodrigo
dc.contributor.otherCano Londoño, Natalia
dc.contributor.otherVetroni Barros, Murillo
dc.contributor.otherChoconta Bernal, Daniel
dc.contributor.otherNadal, Ana
dc.contributor.otherGuerrero, Ana Belén
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-13T17:14:06Z
dc.date.available2024-11-13T17:14:06Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.issn2352-5509en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=178277en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/6772
dc.description.abstractThis study assesses for the first time the drivers, opportunities, barriers, and strategies for the transition to a circular economy in Latin America and the Caribbean through a comprehensive systematic review of the current academic literature. A total of 247 articles have been analysed through the lens of the PESTLE framework (Political, Economic, Social, Technological, Legal, and Environmental), coupled with the consideration of the most recognised circular economy strategies (narrowing, slowing, closing, and regenerating) and solutions (the ten R's strategies: refuse, rethink, reduce, reuse, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose, recycle, and recover). Key drivers identified in the literature include governmental policy shifts in the region towards circular and sustainable practices. These practices have focused on leveraging the abundance and diversity of natural resources and the region's climatic conditions that favour the development of bio-industries, renewable energies, and innovative sustainable materials, reflecting a clear adaptation of circular economy strategies to the specific needs and resources of Latin America and the Caribbean. Similarly, the technological and regulatory progress in pollution prevention and control, although still slow, has driven the implementation of circular economy strategies, making the role of new circular technologies fundamental for the region's sustainability. Barriers mentioned in the articles include limited governmental incentives, inadequate infrastructure for waste management, and the high costs associated with transitioning to circular economy practices, compounded by a lack of general public awareness and engagement. Regarding the circular economy strategies, the reviewed studies predominantly focus on recycling (“closing”) due to the immediate waste management needs of the region, with less emphasis on resource efficiency (“narrowing” and “slowing”) and minimal adoption of regenerative practices due to higher initial investment demands. Recycling and, to a lesser extent, recovery dominate the ten R's strategies discussed in the literature, indicating still a focus on end-of-life approaches in the region, while strategies like reduce, reuse, and repurpose are gaining representation; however, research on repair, refuse, remanufacture, and refurbishment should be the focus of future investigations. Finally, this article provides guidelines and recommendations for future research to facilitate the deployment and management of a sustainable circular economy in the region.es
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherElsevieren
dc.rights© 2024 The Authorsen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectcircular economyen
dc.subjectGlobal southen
dc.subjectODS 11 Ciudades y comunidades sostenibleses
dc.subjectODS 12 Producción y consumo responsableses
dc.titleCircular economy in Latin America and the Caribbean: Drivers, opportunities, barriers and strategiesen
dcterms.accessRightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2en
dcterms.sourceSustainable Production and Consumptionen
local.contributor.groupEconomía Circular y Sostenibilidad Industriales
local.description.peerreviewedtrueen
local.description.publicationfirstpage118en
local.description.publicationlastpage136en
local.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.09.006en
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/01cc3fy72en
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/027m9bs27
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/04v0snf24
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/007fpb915
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/04qtj9h94
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/006hf6230
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/049rrx986
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/05bpb0y22
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/03jzm5a44
local.contributor.otherinstitutionTrisquel Consulting Group
local.source.detailsVol. 51
oaire.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
oaire.file$DSPACE\assetstoreen
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501en
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85en
dc.unesco.tesaurohttp://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept8726en
dc.unesco.clasificacionhttp://skos.um.es/unesco6/5306en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Simple record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International