Simple record

dc.rights.licenseAttribution 4.0 International*
dc.contributor.authorLarrinaga, Felix
dc.contributor.authorOchoa, William
dc.contributor.authorPerez Riaño, Alain
dc.contributor.otherGarcia Represa, Jaime
dc.contributor.otherVarga, Pal
dc.contributor.otherKozma, Daniel
dc.contributor.otherDelsing, Jerker
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-22T15:13:38Z
dc.date.available2023-02-22T15:13:38Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=171443en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/5993
dc.description.abstractIn an era ruled by data and information, engineers need new tools to cope with the increased complexity of industrial operations. New architectural models for industry enable open communication environments, where workflows can play a major role in providing flexible and dynamic interactions between systems. Workflows help engineers maintain precise control over their factory equipment and Information Technology (IT) services, from the initial design stages to plant operations. The current application of workflows departs from the classic business workflows that focus on office automation systems in favor of a manufacturing-oriented approach that involves direct interaction with cyber-physical systems (CPSs) on the shop floor. This paper identifies relevant industry-related challenges that hinder the adoption of workflow technology, which are classified within the context of a cohesive workflow lifecycle. The classification compares the various workflow management solutions and systems used to monitor and execute workflows. These solutions have been developed alongside the Eclipse Arrowhead framework, which provides a common infrastructure for designing systems according to the microservice architectural principles. This paper investigates and compares various solutions for workflow management and execution in light of the associated industrial requirements. Further, it compares various microservice-based approaches and their implementation. The objective is to support industrial stakeholders in their decision-making with regard to choosing among workflow management solutions.en
dc.description.sponsorshipComisión Europeaes
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherMDPIen
dc.rights© 2023 The Authorsen
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectArrowhead frameworken
dc.subjectbusiness process managementen
dc.subjectworkflow managementen
dc.subjectworkflow executionen
dc.subjectservice-oriented architectureen
dc.subjectmicroservicesen
dc.subjectweb service automationen
dc.titleInvestigation of Microservice-Based Workflow Management Solutions for Industrial Automationen
dcterms.accessRightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2en
dcterms.sourceApplied Sciencesen
local.contributor.groupIngeniería del software y sistemases
local.description.peerreviewedtrueen
local.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/app13031835en
local.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/826452/EU/Arrowhead Tools for Engineering of Digitalisation Solutions/Arrowhead Toolsen
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/016st3p78en
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/02w42ss30en
local.source.detailsVol. 13. N. 3. N. artículo 1835, 2023en
oaire.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
oaire.file$DSPACE\assetstore
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501en
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85en


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Simple record

Attribution 4.0 International
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Attribution 4.0 International