Izenburua
On the mitigation of detrimental effects via passive flow-control devices in aerodynamic airfoils operating under turbulence and surface degradation effectsEgilea
Beste erakundeak
https://ror.org/03n6nwv02Bertsioa
PostprintaDokumentu-mota
ArtikuluaHizkuntza
IngelesaEskubideak
© AIPSarbidea
Sarbide irekiaArgitaratzailearen bertsioa
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0322591Identifikadorea
https://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=201540Non argitaratua
Physics of Fluids Vol. 38 (4). N. art. 044112Argitaratzailea
AIP PublishingGako-hitzak
Aerodynamic stallings
Airfoils
Boundary layer flow
Boundary layers ... [+]
Airfoils
Boundary layer flow
Boundary layers ... [+]
Aerodynamic stallings
Airfoils
Boundary layer flow
Boundary layers
Flow control
Surface roughness
Turbulence
Wind power
Wind tunnels [-]
Airfoils
Boundary layer flow
Boundary layers
Flow control
Surface roughness
Turbulence
Wind power
Wind tunnels [-]
Gaia (UNESCO Tesauroa)
Fluidoen mekanikaTermodinamika
UNESCO Sailkapena
Fluidoen mekanikaTermodinamika
Laburpena
This work investigates how moderate turbulence and surface roughness jointly affect the aerodynamics of a NACA0021
airfoil operating at transitional Reynolds numbers (Re = 0.8–1.2×105). Wind-tunnel t ... [+]
This work investigates how moderate turbulence and surface roughness jointly affect the aerodynamics of a NACA0021
airfoil operating at transitional Reynolds numbers (Re = 0.8–1.2×105). Wind-tunnel tests were performed under two
controlled flow paradigms: a low-disturbance Clean condition and a Combined condition including both freestream
turbulence (I ≈3.8%) and leading-edge roughness. In addition to the baseline (Bare) configuration, two unilateral
passive-device layouts were tested, with triangular protrusions placed at x/c = 0.25 (PD25) and x/c = 0.5 (PD50).
Results show that the Combined inflow linearises the lift curve and softens stall but reduces lift slope and aerodynamic
efficiency by up to 60% compared with the Clean baseline. The effect of the passive devices depends on
their position and on Re: PD25 can delay stall and recover efficiency at high angles of attack, while PD50 offers only
limited or negative impact once the boundary layer becomes fully turbulent. Overall, the findings demonstrate that turbulence–
roughness interactions dominate aerodynamic behaviour at transitional scales, and that small passive elements
can provide only local improvements. These results underline the need to assess low-Re airfoils under realistic inflow
conditions when developing flow-control strategies for distributed or urban wind-energy systems. [-]



















