Title
Multi-Objective Comparative Analysis of Active Modular Rectifier Architectures for a More Electric AircraftAuthor
Author (from another institution)
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-contributorOtherinstitution
https://ror.org/03hp1m080Version
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
Rights
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPIAccess
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Publisher’s version
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace9020098Published at
Aerospace Vol. 9. N. 2. N. artículo 98, 2022Publisher
MDPIKeywords
more electric aircraft
electric power system architecture
aerospace generation drives
AC–DC converter ... [+]
electric power system architecture
aerospace generation drives
AC–DC converter ... [+]
more electric aircraft
electric power system architecture
aerospace generation drives
AC–DC converter
three-phase rectifier
HVDC
power factor correction (PFC) [-]
electric power system architecture
aerospace generation drives
AC–DC converter
three-phase rectifier
HVDC
power factor correction (PFC) [-]
Abstract
Aircraft electrification requires reliable, power-dense, high-efficient, and bidirectional rectifiers to improve the overall performance of existing aircrafts. Thus, traditional bulky passive rectifie ... [+]
Aircraft electrification requires reliable, power-dense, high-efficient, and bidirectional rectifiers to improve the overall performance of existing aircrafts. Thus, traditional bulky passive rectifiers must be substituted by active rectifiers, satisfying the requirements imposed by up-to-date standards. However, several challenges are found in terms of power controllability, due to the standardized passive rectifier-based operating conditions. This work presents the implementation of an active rectifier modular architecture for aircraft applications. An analysis of the technical difficulties and limitations was performed and three innovative modular architectures are proposed and designed. In order to find the most suitable architecture, a comparison framework is proposed, focusing on efficiency, volume, and reliability parameters. From the comparative analysis, it can be concluded that the two-stage configuration architecture is a good solution in terms of semiconductor life expectancy and low volume. However, if converter redundancies are required, the single-stage with STATCOM configuration is an excellent trade-off between low volume, redundancy, and cost-effectiveness. [-]
xmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-sponsorship
Comisión Europeaxmlui.dri2xhtml.METS-1.0.item-projectID
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/783158/EU/first and euRopEAn siC eigTh Inches pilOt liNe/REACTIONCollections
- Articles - Engineering [684]
The following license files are associated with this item: