<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><?xml-stylesheet href='static/style.xsl' type='text/xsl'?><OAI-PMH xmlns="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/OAI-PMH.xsd"><responseDate>2026-04-30T16:28:11Z</responseDate><request verb="GetRecord" identifier="oai:ebiltegia.mondragon.edu:20.500.11984/5217" metadataPrefix="rdf">https://ebiltegia.mondragon.edu/oai/request</request><GetRecord><record><header><identifier>oai:ebiltegia.mondragon.edu:20.500.11984/5217</identifier><datestamp>2025-04-15T11:56:47Z</datestamp><setSpec>com_20.500.11984_473</setSpec><setSpec>col_20.500.11984_478</setSpec></header><metadata><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/" xmlns:ow="http://www.ontoweb.org/ontology/1#" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:ds="http://dspace.org/ds/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:doc="http://www.lyncode.com/xoai" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/rdf.xsd">
   <ow:Publication rdf:about="oai:ebiltegia.mondragon.edu:20.500.11984/5217">
      <dc:title>Ball-on-flat linear reciprocating tests: Critical assessment of wear volume determination methods and suggested improvements for ASTM D7755 standard</dc:title>
      <dc:creator>Ayerdi, Jon</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Aginagalde, Andrea</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Llavori, Inigo</dc:creator>
      <dc:creator>Zabala, Alaitz</dc:creator>
      <dc:contributor>Bonse, Jörn</dc:contributor>
      <dc:contributor>Spaltmann, Dirk</dc:contributor>
      <dc:subject>Wear</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Sliding</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Surface</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>Analysis</dc:subject>
      <dc:subject>ASTM D7755-11</dc:subject>
      <dc:description>This work presents a critical assessment of wear volume determination methods for ball-on-flat linear reciprocating sliding tribological tests. It revealed that the ASTM D7755-11 standard leads to the highest relative errors (up to 106%) and deviations (up to 27%) depending on the regularity of the wear track shape. The present study suggests improvements for the ASTM D7755-11 wear computation, which can reduce errors from 106% to 17% when analysing irregularly shaped wear tracks. In addition, a five-year period review of two relevant tribology journals revealed that the most used methods for wear determination, namely three-dimensional (3D) profilometry (46%) and nonstandard profile-based methods (36%), are overall reported with incomplete procedural information for wear computation. Furthermore, as many as 8% of the papers specify no data regarding the computation method and only 3% explicitly cited and followed the existing standards (ASTM D7755-11 or G133-05). The present study highlights the importance of the correct selection, implementation, and reporting of wear volume computation method and quantifies the potential errors.</dc:description>
      <dc:date>2021-02-15T10:27:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021-02-15T10:27:00Z</dc:date>
      <dc:date>2021</dc:date>
      <dc:type>http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501</dc:type>
      <dc:identifier>0043-1648</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&amp;ficha_no=162588</dc:identifier>
      <dc:identifier>https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/5217</dc:identifier>
      <dc:language>eng</dc:language>
      <dc:rights>© 2021 Elsevier B.V.</dc:rights>
      <dc:publisher>Elsevier B.V.</dc:publisher>
   </ow:Publication>
</rdf:RDF></metadata></record></GetRecord></OAI-PMH>