Registro sencillo

dc.contributor.authorBaskaran, Maider
dc.contributor.authorde la Calle, Amaia
dc.contributor.authorHarismendy, Isabel
dc.contributor.authorGarcía Arrieta, Sonia
dc.contributor.authorElizetxea, Cristina
dc.contributor.authorAretxabaleta, Laurentzi
dc.contributor.authorAurrekoetxea, Jon
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-29T10:07:31Z
dc.date.available2025-01-29T10:07:31Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationBaskaran, M., de la Calle, A., Harismendy, I., García-Arrieta, S., Elizetxea, C., Aretxabaleta, L., & Aurrekoetxea, J. (2024). Impact performance comparison of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 and fast-curing epoxy composites manufactured by resin transfer molding. Polymer Composites. https://doi.org/10.1002/PC.29317
dc.identifier.issn0272-8397
dc.identifier.otherhttps://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=178848
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/6871
dc.description.abstractIn the present paper, we manufactured carbon fiber-reinforced polyamide-6 composite (CF-PA6) by resin transfer molding and compared their impact performance with an equivalent automotive grade epoxy-matrix composite (CF-Epoxy). Such comparison is pertinent as the new thermoplastic composite will compete with the traditional thermosetting composite, so impact characterization carried out at the same conditions is necessary for evaluating the possibilities of the new material. The energy dissipation capacity of the CF-PA6 was 27% higher, the maximum impact-peak load was 5% smaller, and the damage threshold was similar for both composites. Regarding residual post-impact properties of samples damaged by a 25 J impact energy, CF-PA6 retained 62% of its stiffness, 84% of its strength and 67% of its energy dissipation capacity. In contrast, CF-Epoxy retained 46%, 44% and 40% respectively. Highlights: Comparison of impact behavior between CF-PA6 (RTM) and CF-Epoxy (RTM). The damage thresholds of both composites were similar (~2.5 J). The penetration and perforation thresholds of CF-PA6 were 48% and 27% higher. Post-impact residual property: CF-PA6 retained 60% of its stiffness.en
dc.language.isoeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.rights© 2024 Society of Plastics Engineers
dc.subjectImpact behavior
dc.subjectResin transfer molding (RTM)
dc.subjectThermoplastic resin
dc.subjectODS 9 Industria, innovación e infraestructura
dc.titleImpact performance comparison of carbon fiber reinforced polyamide 6 and fast-curing epoxy composites manufactured by resin transfer moldingen
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dcterms.accessRightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cf
dcterms.sourcePolymer Composites
dc.date.updated2025-01-29T10:07:31Z
local.contributor.groupTecnología de plásticos y compuestos
local.description.peerreviewedtrue
local.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1002/pc.29317
local.embargo.enddate2144-12-31
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/02fv8hj62
local.source.detailsEarly View
oaire.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
oaire.file$DSPACE\assetstore
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85


Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(es)

Registro sencillo