Simple record

dc.contributor.authorRuiz de Azua Lahidalga, Irati
dc.contributor.authorMendiburu Valor, Eider
dc.contributor.authorJustel Lozano, Daniel
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Mendoza, Joan Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-07T16:21:35Z
dc.date.available2024-11-07T16:21:35Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.isbn978-3-00-079330-1en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=178364en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/6760
dc.description.abstractRenewable energies play a key role in achieving climate neutrality by 2050. However, although their environmental impact is generally lower compared to conventional energy sources, it is crucial to focus attention on the d esign a nd l ife c ycle m anagement ( LCM) o f t he components and equipment of these technology systems to further mitigate potential negative effects on the environment. Power electronics plays a crucial role in the production o f r enewable e nergy ( RE) d ue t o i ts r ole i n t he conversion, control and distribution of electrical energy generated by renewable sources, such as solar or wind. Nevertheless, there is a lack of information available in the literature on the ecodesign performance of these products. This article explores the applicability of ecodesign criteria in the power electronics (PE) industry. For this purpose, a database of ecodesign criteria, based on the specifications from the EU Ecodesign Directive, was developed and tested with different industrial actors to gather the perception from the industry on the actual applicability of these ecodesign criteria in the design and LCM of PEs. The results indicate that the most important ecodesign criteria are those related to the Installation/Use/Maintenance life cycle stage of power converters, focusing on improving equipment efficiency by minimizing energy losses and ensuring optimal operation through proper maintenance. In contrast, end-of-life aspects of the converter are the least addressed by the industry. Differences in the implementation of ecodesign criteria between institutions have been analysed, while the ecodesign aspects of the directive have been compared with the actual perception of the PE industry. This includes an analysis of the criteria with the lowest circularity potential versus the highest rated criteria according to life cycle stage.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherFraunhofer IZMen
dc.rights© Fraunhofer IZMen
dc.subjectPower electronicsen
dc.subjectcircular economyen
dc.subjecteco-designen
dc.titleCircular Power Electronics: Exploring the Scope and Suitability of Ecodesign Criteria for the Power Electronics Industryen
dcterms.accessRightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_f1cfen
dcterms.sourceElectronics Goes Green (EGG)en
local.contributor.groupEconomía Circular y Sostenibilidad Industriales
local.description.peerreviewedtrueen
local.description.publicationfirstpage347en
local.description.publicationlastpage354en
local.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.23919/EGG62010.2024.10631184en
local.embargo.enddate2144-12-31
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/01cc3fy72
local.source.detailsBerlin, Germany. 18-20 junio, 2024
oaire.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
oaire.file$DSPACE\assetstoreen
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_c94fen
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85en
dc.unesco.tesaurohttp://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept5767en
oaire.funderNameComision Europeaen
oaire.funderIdentifierhttps://ror.org/00k4n6c32 / http://data.crossref.org/fundingdata/funder/10.13039/501100000780en
oaire.fundingStreamHORIZON-CL5en
oaire.awardNumber101075496en
oaire.awardTitleNext generation modular SIC-based advanced power electronics converters FOR enhanced renewables integration into the GRID (SiC4GRID)en
oaire.awardURIhttps://doi.org/10.3030/101075496en
dc.unesco.clasificacionhttp://skos.um.es/unesco6/2203en


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Simple record