Simple record

dc.contributor.authorMartinez-Gorrotxategi, Agurtzane
dc.contributor.authorAgirre, Nerea
dc.contributor.authorBilbatua Pérez, Mariam
dc.contributor.otherLópez de Arana Prado, Elena
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T11:33:19Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T11:33:19Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-19
dc.identifier.issn1470-1103en
dc.identifier.otherhttps://katalogoa.mondragon.edu/janium-bin/janium_login_opac.pl?find&ficha_no=153688en
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11984/13943
dc.description.abstractThe present study focuses on students’ reflection during practicum seminars. The practicum is the ideal setting for reflection. Three levels of reflection have been identified. The second and third, which address the theory-practice relationship, guarantee quality in reflection. This relationship has been researched through participation patterns and tutor assistance. In this paper, we try to clarify which strategies elicit a higher quality of joint reflection. To this end, a case study was performed in the context of the Practicum III course (30 ECTS credits), taken in the fourth and final year of a bachelor’s degree program in Primary Education. 2 tutors and 10 student teachers (all women) participated in the study. The student teachers jointly analyzed several real situations that occurred during their practicum. The seminars were recorded, transcribed and coded for subsequent interactivity and content analysis. Five situations were analyzed. At the second level of reflection, the theory-practice relationship emerged during the interpretative pattern when the tutor gave assistance that facilitated a theoretical framework and academic knowledge to the student teachers, who were attempting to understand and/or solve the dilemmas of the situation under consideration. These interactions were able to mitigate the power of the ‘apprenticeship of observation’.en
dc.language.isoengen
dc.publisherTaylor & Francis Groupen
dc.rights© Taylor & Francisen
dc.subjectJoint reflectionen
dc.subjectTheory-practice relationshipen
dc.subjectParticipation patternsen
dc.subjectTutor assistanceen
dc.subjectApprenticenship of observationen
dc.titleMore about strategies to improve the quality of joint reflection based on the theory-practice relationship during practicum seminarsen
dcterms.accessRightshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2en
dcterms.sourceReflective Practice: International and Multidisciplinary Perspectivesen
local.contributor.groupHezkuntza berrikuntzaeu
local.contributor.groupInnovación educativaes
local.contributor.groupHezkuntza prozesuakeu
local.contributor.groupProcesos educativoses
local.description.peerreviewedtrueen
local.description.publicationfirstpage790en
local.description.publicationlastpage807en
local.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2019.1690982en
local.contributor.otherinstitutionhttps://ror.org/000xsnr85es
local.source.details20(6)en
oaire.format.mimetypeapplication/pdfen
oaire.file$DSPACE\assetstoreen
oaire.resourceTypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501en
oaire.versionhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aaen
dc.unesco.tesaurohttp://vocabularies.unesco.org/thesaurus/concept2en
oaire.funderNameThe present study focuses on students’ reflection during practicum seminars. The practicum is the ideal setting for reflection. Three levels of reflection have been identified. The second and third, which address the theory-practice relationship, guarantee quality in reflection. This relationship has been researched through participation patterns and tutor assistance. In this paper, we try to clarify which strategies elicit a higher quality of joint reflection. To this end, a case study was performed in the context of the Practicum III course (30 ECTS credits), taken in the fourth and final year of a bachelor’s degree program in Primary Education. 2 tutors and 10 student teachers (all women) participated in the study. The student teachers jointly analyzed several real situations that occurred during their practicum. The seminars were recorded, transcribed and coded for subsequent interactivity and content analysis. Five situations were analyzed. At the second level of reflection, the theory-practice relationship emerged during the interpretative pattern when the tutor gave assistance that facilitated a theoretical framework and academic knowledge to the student teachers, who were attempting to understand and/or solve the dilemmas of the situation under consideration. These interactions were able to mitigate the power of the ‘apprenticeship of observation’.en
oaire.funderIdentifierhttps://ror.org/038jjxj40 / http://data.crossref.org/fundingdata/funder/10.13039/501100010198en
oaire.awardNumberEDU2013-44632-Pen
oaire.awardTitleAyudas a la construcción del conocimiento en el prácticum de maestros: la reflexión conjunta para mejorar la relación teoría-prácticaen
dc.unesco.clasificacionhttp://skos.um.es/unesco6/580302en


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Simple record